论文代写-英语日语韩语德语俄语法语
论文翻译-英语日语韩语德语俄语法语
论文修改-英语日语韩语德语俄语法语
代写作业代考试题考卷-英语日语韩语德语俄语法语
作文报告申请书文章等代写-英语日语韩语德语俄语法语
研究计划书代写-英语日语韩语德语俄语法语
西班牙语意大利语论文代写翻译修改
论文发表-英语日语韩语德语俄语法语
英语 English
日语 日本語
韩语한국의
法语 Français
德语 Deutsch
俄语 Pусский
西语 Español
意语 Italiano
·英语论文 ·日语论文
·韩语论文 ·德语论文
·法语论文 ·俄语论文

名称:智尚工作室
电话:0760-86388801
传真:0760-85885119
地址:广东中山市学院路1号
网址:www.zsfy.org
E-Mail:cjpdd
@vip.163.com
商务QQ:875870576
微信二维码

业务联系
英语论文
the implementation of the task-based approach in secondary English teaching
添加时间: 2019-7-11 14:30:30 来源: 作者: 点击数:1318

内容摘要

国家关于基础教育阶段英语课程的标准是:激发和培养学生学习英语的兴趣,通过体验、合作交流等多种学习方式和采用交际型教学法、任务型教学法等多种教学方式,发展学生的语言综合运用能力。

任务型教学法是从20世纪80年代逐渐发展起来,广为应用语言学家和外语教学实践者认可和接受的一种外语教学方法。它以完成任务的欲望为动力,以用语言做事为完成任务的过程,以展示任务成果来体现教学的成就。多年研究表明,任务型教学法有利于学生进行自主学习,提高学生运用语言进行交际的实际能力,增强学生学习的兴趣和积极性。

    在初中基础教育中,英语课程的教学占有重要地位。初中阶段的英语教学效果将直接影响学生未来在高中,乃至大学阶段的英语学习。受基础教育普遍注重理论知识讲授的制约,初中英语教师在教学过程中较为强调单词的记忆数量及英语语法的学习。传统的初中教学以教师讲授为主,所谓的填鸭式教学要求学生以记忆单词和句型为主,抹煞了学生学习的主动性和积极性。由此,这种过于程序与抽象化的教学方法就给学生在英语学习方面带来了负担。因此,如何在初中英语教学中开展任务型教学活动便成了中心议题。

关键词: 任务型教学法;初中;英语教学

Abstract

The standard for English courses in junior high schools in our country is to motivate and cultivate students interest in learning English, and to develop students language abilities by using varieties of learning ways such as experiencing and cooperation and also by using kinds of teaching methods such as communicative teaching approach and task-based language teaching.

The task-based language teaching, which has developed from the 1980s, is widely accepted and acknowledged by linguists and foreign language professors. Its purpose is to accomplish the tasks, its process is to learn by doing and its outcome is shown by presentation of finished tasks. Years of research have proved that the task-based language teaching do make for students learning by themselves, improving their communicative abilities and abilities to solve problems, and enhancing their interest and confidence in English learning.

In the English education of junior high schools, the English teaching plays a very important role. The teaching effect in junior high schools will have a very direct effect on the English learning of students in senior high schools, even in colleges in the future. Restricted by the traditional teaching method that puts emphasis on the theories, the teachers in junior high schools also place their emphasis on the amount of words memorized by students and the learning of English grammar in the teaching process. The traditional teaching method discourages students to take initiatives to learn. Therefore, it becomes the hot topic about how to implement the task-based approach in secondary English teaching.  

Key Words: task-based teaching method; junior school; English teaching

Contents     

1. Introduction………………………………………………………………………….1

2. Current Situation of English Teaching in Junior High Schools…………………..2

3. Task-Based Approach……………………………………………………………….3

  3.1 Task-based approach……………………………………………………………………………3

  3.2 Advantages of task-based approach…………………………………………………………….4

4. Application of Task-Based Approach in Junior High School English Teaching.4 

  4.1 Designing appropriate tasks in junior high school English teaching…………………………...4

  4.2 Implementing tasks in junior high school English classes……………………………………...6

    4.2.1 Requiring teachers to understand more…………………………………………………….6

4.2.2 Stimulating students’ engagement in tasks…………………………………………………7

  4.3 Making proper assessment of tasks……………………………………………………………..7

    4.3.1 Evaluating students by performance assessment……………………………………………7

    4.3.2 Advocating different types of assessment…………………………………………………..8

    4.3.3 Achieving ideal effects of assessment……………………………………………………….8

5. Conclusion……………………………………………………………………………..9

References………………………………………………………………………………..9

Acknowledgements……………………………………………………………………... 11


1. Introduction 

Nowadays, with Chinas entering WTO, the foreign trade and all kinds of business activities involving imports and exports are increasing by leaps and bounds. The more and more common use of English strengthens our awareness of the significance of English education, especially from junior high   schools.

New English Curriculum Standards (2003) requires that the emphasis should be put on adopting the approach of task-based teaching, promoting the students’ cultural consciousness and the ability of studying independently. It is also in the New English Curriculum Standard issued by the National Ministry of Education in the nationwide curriculum reform elementary and secondary schools that task-based language teaching is advocated.

The task-based language teaching, which has developed from the 1980s, has been proved the most effective approach to provide a helpful interactive framework and to make students active and interested in learning and to exploit their potential language ability. It can also evoke their energy to use the language creatively. This new trend is marked as developing the students’ ability of using language by teaching goal being recognized. The students need to acquire the language by finishing their own tasks. Task-based teaching approach first emerged in Hong Kong. And it has made great progress in China since 2001. It points out that the objective of the English course in secondary education is to change the traditional teaching from overemphasizing grammar and vocabulary, neglecting the training of practical language competence, to task-based language teaching, which sets its steps on the ground of students, interests, experience and cognitive level in order to develop students' complex language competence, to form learning strategies for the purpose of raising autonomous learning ability by advocating the ways of experiencing, practicing, participating and cooperating. 

Now in China, the teaching methods that the teachers mainly apply are still centered on the lectures and the catechetical method. Sometimes, many lectures can not achieve the ideal teaching effect except making students more confused and lose the main points. In our traditional teaching process, teachers are the main body of the classes, who decide the teaching contents and the outcome. On the other hand, students become very passive in learning. They just, at very most, learn some isolated grammar and expressions. They can not apply English to make real communications, let alone express their feelings and thoughts freely. Teachers and students have been accustomed the grammar translation method which has its shortcomings. It can not solve the problem of students mastering the communicative competence. In addition, Chinese typical learning style and National University Entering Test also make great difficulties for students to change their attention from language knowledge to language skills. 

In contrast, task-based language teaching can reflect that foreign language teaching has transferred from emphasizing language knowledge to emphasizing cultivation of linguistic and communicative abilities, from emphasizing teachers’ rol, e to students participation, and from teacher-centered to student-centered. It can make students take part in a large variety of activities, and students are required to complete a series of tasks, and they can get more opportunities to communicate with each other. Task-based Language Teaching is a kind of teaching method by taking concrete task as the motivation of study, taking the process of completing task as the process of study, presenting achievement by displaying task result.

    This essay puts its emphasis on the practical application of the task-based approach in secondary English teaching. The main point lies on how to apply the approach to junior students, which puts forward very high requirements for both teachers and students, for design and implementation of tasks and the assessment of students performances. There are in all five chapters in this essay. Chapter one states the research background and the significance of our promoting the task-based language teaching in junior high school English classes. Chapter two will introduce the current situation of English teachers and teaching in junior high schools. Chapter three briefly introduces the basic concepts of task-based approach and its advantages. Chapter four, which is the core unit of this essay, will present the practical application of task-based language teaching in junior high school English classes. Chapter five is a conclusion. Nowadays, the task-based approach has been widely applied in the college English eduction, and the author hopes the approach can be also successfully applied to junior students in order to change the traditional way of method in junior school as the task-based language teaching is really appropriate to make students in junior high school develop their initiatives and become active in classes and also very cooperative.

2. Current Situation of English Teaching in Junior High Schools

    The teaching in classes consists of varieties of elements such as the teachers, the students, the textbooks and the teaching methods and so on, among which the teaching methods play a big role in deciding the final effects of teaching. The core of these teaching methods serve to the accomplishment of teaching tasks and goals and to make all these teaching elements develop their respective functions in the classes in order to achieve the ideal outcome. It can be seen that teaching methods are key to success of teaching process.

Traditional English teaching in junior high schools still puts emphasis on lectures and the teachers are still the main body of classes. Students are very passive in classes. They just passively accept the words and sentence patterns that the teachers teach. They do not think. Take my internship in junior high schools for example, teachers read the new words in front of the class, and the students were required to read the words one time after another following the teacher. They did not know the meaning of the words and did not know how to apply these words in daily lives. The only thing that they knew was just to recite the words. Especially for junior students, they just get in touch with this subject and if they do not master the correct way of learning English, they will not understand what the teachers are teaching. What is worse, they do not have the courage and determination to overcome the shortcomings. With the time passing by, they will lose the desire to learn English. When I had my internship in junior schools, I noticed that especially for some boys, they could hardly concentrate their attention on the class, and they always kept their mind wandering outside the class, which was dull and boring for them. Therefore, if the teachers can not attract students interest in English in junior high schools, students will not take active part in the class and become interested.

The current situation in junior high schools mainly involves the following questions. The first one is that the objective of most of the students is very vague. Most of the students learn English just for the exams and some of students do not know why they should have this class. They have no goals. The second one is the teachers role in the class. Most of the teachers, affected by the traditional teaching mode, just give lectures in the class. They just transfer what is in the book and their focus has been laid on words reciting and language points. They have neglected the practical use of English to communicate and to apply in daily lives. The third one is that the teaching method is very dull, which can not stimulate students interest. For instance, when I practiced my teaching in junior schools, I found that most of the teachers would apply the same method as teaching, reading, assigning the homework and so like. Such teaching process is simple and plain with no interest. Junior students are very young, and they are very energetic. So they can not sit there quietly listening to teachers. They love games, and outdoors activities. They need a very active and creative teaching method. The forth one needs to be mentioned is that our assessment of students grades is too old and dull. At present, exams seem to be the only way to judge students learning. And also the exams in junior high schools place much emphasis on testing grammar and language points, rather than on listening and speaking, which goes the wrong way in English teaching.

3. Task-Based Approach  

3.1 Task-based approach    

Tasked-based language teaching started in the late 1970s and the early 1980s. It was David Nunan who proposed such an approach. Nunan, an eminent authority in task-based language teaching maintains that setting specific tasks for students so that they act as if they were using the language in real life – this is part of the essence of task-based teaching.

Research of task has been conducted from the thirties of the nineteenth century, and the term “task” has been defined in many different ways.  

For example, Longman dictionary illustrates: A task is a piece of work undertaken for oneself or for others, freely or for some reward. Thus, examples of tasks include painting a fence, dressing a child, filling out a form, buying a pair of shoes, making an airline reservation, borrowing a library book, taking a driving test, typing a letter, weighing a patient, sorting letters, taking a hotel reservation, writing a check, finding a street destination and helping someone across a road. (Longman1985:89, cited in Nunan, 2001:24) 

Tasks are activities where the target language is used by the learner for communicative purpose in order to accomplish an outcome. (Jane Willis, 1996)

A task is an activity or action which is carried out as the result of processing or understanding language (i.e. as a response). (Richards, Platt and Weber, 1986:289)

From them, we can find the following features about task: it is a piece of meaning-focused work, and a piece of work involving learners and communicative language skills, and a series of interactions that are needed to meet the learners’ ends. In other words, a task is a piece of work that is done by learners in their daily life. It involves learners’ processing information and using target language, and then a final product is finished. These definitions we have looked at give one thing in common: they all mean that tasks involve communicative language use in which the user's attention is focused on meaning rather than the linguistic structure. For example, Long mentions filling out a form, making an airline reservation, and taking a driving test and so like. In these real life situations, students are required to apply English to achieve communicative tasks by using words and expressions taught in the class. In the task-based approach, the focus is on the outcome of the activity rather than on the language used to achieve that outcome. 

    There are several basic elements in application of task-based approach. The first one is the goal. The task-based approach is task-oriented, and the goal is like the beacon on the sea, giving guidance to those sailing boats. Every teaching task must have its goal and the goal must be very clear and definite. As mentioned above, the aim of language teaching is to communicate with target language in real life, which decides what kind of tasks we should design. The second one is the teaching contents. What should students do in the class? Every task must be endowed with the specific contents. The contents of the task-based approach are the exact activities and programs that students need to present in the classes. The third element is the procedure. We can simply call it “how”, which means the operating methods and ways in implementing the tasks. It includes the priority, order and time allocation and so on. The forth one is the input materials. The materials refer to the supplementary information relied on in the process of the tasks. For example, if the teachers want to assign the task about dining at restaurant, they should provide students with background information about western food and culture. These materials can be verbal, such as the news report, the brochure, product instructions, and weather reports and so on, or can be non-verbal, such as the pictures, forms, maps, train schedule, cartoons and so on. These materials are not necessarily needed in every class, but thorough preparation will make teaching smoother and easier to operate. The fifth one is roles of teachers and students. Their roles are not very certain in the tasks. They can be both. Teachers can be organizers, and also participants in the tasks. Sometimes, teachers can specify the roles in order to make students understand clearly their respective tasks. The last one is the situation. This element refers to the environment or background that the tasks are to be carried out, including the real and specific context of language communication and also the class teaching. In the task, the situation should be as close as possible to real life in order to increase students’ consciousness between language and situation.

3.2 Advantages of task-based approach

One of the most beneficial advantages of task-based approach is that it can promote all the students to take an active par in the class. All the students can be involved in class activities to develop their abilities to practice, imagine, creatively think and communicate. Take my internship for example, when students have learned mother, father, brother, grandma and so like, I required them to take their favorite pictures of their family members and make a photo show in the class. Every student would explain the picture as This is my brother. He is playing basketball. After students made presentations, they would finally elect the best speaker. Students were all very interested and active. They made full preparations before the class and they made wonderful performance on the class. The class, in the end, had achieved its teaching goal and students gained the chance to develop themselves.

Task-based approach is otherwise very helpful for students to master the language points and skills by learning themselves. Students will look into books, dictionaries, and other sources of information actively by themselves, which is good to cultivate their independence. What is more, the approach will promote students to take part in the activities, developing their imagination and creative thinking, making them the main body of the class. The last but not the least, students can broaden their mind as plenty of materials provide. Anyway, in this approach, students can develop their abilities of thinking, communicating and solving problems, and form very good habits of learning.

Task-based language teaching is a dynamic teaching method, aiming at making language teaching real and social. The task of language study is to make students communicate with others for some purpose. Language study is a kind of learning done in practice, and the core of task-based approach is to focus on learners, not teachers. In the task-based language teaching, teachers will design class activities according to the texts which students are very familiar with in real life in order to create real situations. In the teaching process, teachers are only instructors, and organizers, giving guidance and answers. Learners are not passive any more and they become active to think and take part in these activities, which will change the traditional dull classes, stimulate students interest, and develop their potentials. Students will be the real main body of English classes.

4. Application of Task-Based Approach in Junior High School English Teaching

4.1 Designing appropriate tasks in junior high school English teaching

One of the most essential problems that need to be solved in the task-based language teaching is how to design tasks and what principles should be followed. The application of task-based language teaching in junior high school English classes should also be in accordance with these principles.

    The first and the most important principle is the reality rule. This principle refers to that in the designing of tasks, the materials teachers use should originate from the real life, and the situations in which the tasks will be accomplished should be as close as possible to real happenings. For instance, in the English classes of junior high school, several units have introduced words, sentences, dialogues about life situations such as shopping, asking the way, calling a visit, dining at a restaurant and so on. In the teaching process, teachers can divide the whole class into groups and leave each group a task in which students are required to show the situations by presentations within limited times. They can use the words and expressions learned in the textbooks. Take my internship for example, student A can play the role as a restaurant waiter, and student B can play the role as a customer. The two students can make the performance about dining at a restaurant by using the words such as menu, order and pay, and using the expressions such as May I take your order?. The task not only is close to real life in which students are very familiar, but also can provoke students interest to apply English to communicate and improve their oral English.

    The second principle of function is based on the principle of reality, clarifying the relationship between the language forms and functions. For example, in secondary English teaching, students are required to master the words such as healthy lifestyle, junk food, sleep less, and other sentence patterns. At this time, teachers can assign the task in which students can apply these words to design a situation and organize a dialogue. After that, students are required to present the dialogue by using these words and sentences, in which students can have a good understanding that the purpose of language learning is to communicate in real life.

Thirdly, the designing of tasks should be logically fluent and coherent. For example, in the process of exercising dialogues, the final goal can be divided into several small tasks, such as searching for background information, looking for items, listing related sentence patterns, organizing the dialogue, presentation and so like. For instance, in secondary English teaching, there is a topic about western food. Teachers can ask students, at first, to search the background knowledge about western culture, such as their holidays and eating habits, and then require them to look for related words and sentences, and at last they are inclined to use these words and sentences to organize a dialogue and present it. Students will actively search the relevant information by all means in order to finish the task, such as the library, the computers, the internet and so like and they will get a further understanding of foreign cultures and also the differences between eastern and western cultures.

    Students are always active in games, which teachers should make full use of to attract their attention. Therefore, if we can instill fun into the tasks, students will show their great interest and become very active in class activities. For instance, in secondary English teaching, teachers can design some games, such as words guessing, matching, puzzles and so like to grasp students attention. For another example, there is some topic about exercising. Teachers can divide the class into groups and assign the task to look for related sports in the form of competitions and the teacher can also prepare some prizes, which will greatly provoke students initiatives.

The above principles are very general suggestions for classroom teachers about what can be done in class. Researchers suggest concentrating on content rather than linguistic items. The language that is needed to perform the task which has to be negotiated by the learners in the process of carrying out these tasks with the help of the teacher, whose job is to facilitate learning opportunities in class (Kumaravadivelu, 1993).

4.2 Implementing tasks in junior high school English classes

4.2.1 Requiring teachers to understand more

As there are many principles to the designing of tasks, there comes up many higher requirements for teachers when they design the tasks.

Take my internship for example. At first, teachers should have a very clear and correct understanding of the teaching goal. Every unit in the secondary English textbook has a teaching goal. Teachers should have a command of the teaching goal from an all-round way, specifying the main points. So teachers will design the task with high quality according to the main points. Take the secondary English teaching for example, the teaching contents involve doing sports, asking the way, complaining, shopping and so like. It is not very realistic for teachers to require students to master every language point, therefore, it demands teachers to analyze and summarize the textbook before the classes and make clear the priorities in class. They can list some language points as important, and others supplementary.

What is more, teachers should have a good understanding of the students in every class that he or she teaches. Students in every class can be divided into several levels from high to low. Some students can easily accept what the teachers have taught and others feel hard, which puts forward higher requirements for teachers, as they must know about the differences in detail before  and in the teaching, and adjust the pace and contents at any time according to the differences. Teachers must take into account all levels of students. The task should not be too hard, which will discourage those students t low levels, making them lose confidence, and the task should also not be too easy, which will make students lose their interest. For instance, in secondary English teaching, there is a topic about vocation. The teacher can assign the task and divide the task into some small tasks. The first one is that teachers can come up with some questions, such as What do you usually do in vocation?, Do you like traveling in vocation?, Where do you want to go?, and Do you think traveling is good to broaden our mind? and so on. The teacher can ask the students, at first, to look for the information on the internet and answer the questions. Such task is very appropriate to all levels of students, and at the same time, motivates the initiatives of all students. For the next step, the teacher can then divide the class into groups, and make sure every group consists of good students and students with a lower level. Then the teacher can ask each group to organize a discussion about holiday activities and require them to use the words and expressions that they previously have found on the internet. Finally, each group will make a presentation in front of class, and teacher will give the final evaluation. Thus, students must be very interested and take part in the task with great enthusiasm. Students with high levels can help with those students with low levels, making them very confident and proud. Low-level students can feel the power of teamwork and the self-value in the team.

The last but not the least, teachers should learn themselves at any time in order to come up with the trend and update themselves. They should adjust the difficulties and the contents of the task according to the features of the textbook, the pace of teaching and the scope of knowledge. For example, with the rapid development of technology, electric products have a great influence on peoples lives, so the teachers can encourage students to search information on internet, and not be confined to the textbook. Teachers themselves should also look for useful information on internet, upgrade with the recent trend, making students know more about the modern times, and broaden their minds.

4.2.2 Stimulating students’ engagement in tasks

In task-based approach, students should become the main body of the class, and they are the real participants, however, in contrast, the teachers should be the instructors, giving supplementary help and guidance. As Nunan suggested, students are inter-actors, presenting their performance in front of the class by using the language points previously learned. Students should be performers, involving every task designed which is close to real life. Students should be encouraged to take part in these activities, which make for their improvement of social communicative abilities. Especially for students who just enter the junior schools, they are curious and scary about learning English. At this time, teachers should help students clear the obstacles in their minds and encourage them to speak English loudly, even they are wrong, which can be corrected next time.

In the teaching process teachers can organize students to make performances about the text and design real situations in which students can express their feelings and thoughts. In such situations, students will associate the real life situations with the language points and skills in the textbook. At the same time, the teaching tools such as the materials, pictures and photos will ensure to attract students attention and their involvement. In task-based approach, there are altogether three phases. The first one is the pre-task phase, in which teachers will introduce the task. And then it comes to the task-cycle phase, in which students will be involved in task-planning and completion. In this phase, all the students will engage in the task to plan, organize, implement and finally report. The third phase is the post-task phase, in which students will analyze their shortcomings and practice the language points with the guidance of teachers.

Take my internship for example, in unit one of the textbook of Go For It for the seventh grade, the first lesson is Where is your pen pal from?. The teaching goal is to make students master some national names, peoples and their languages. Before the class, I required students to look for their favorite football stars and singing stars and some famous scenic spots abroad. In the class, I posted a map on the blackboard and then divided the class into groups with four to six students as one group. Then two students of each group would present their favorite stars in front of the class and then posted their pictures on the map. After the presentation, I made a summary and taught the main points to practice. In this task, students would relate the language with the real life by listening and speaking, and also they would experience the success of completing the task. Students engagement in tasks will arouse their interest to learn English.

4.3 Making proper assessment of tasks

4.3.1 Evaluating students by performance assessment

    National Standards for English Curriculum for junior school students demands the combination of process evaluation and achievement evaluation. It also demands the evaluation should be plural and the form of evaluation should be diversified. Teachers should pay attention to outcome and process as well. Learning by doing is one of the main principles of task-based approach. And one of the main assessments is to finish the task or not. The process of carrying out the task could be an effective method to evaluate students.

Performance assessment is referred to as a systematic attempt to measure a learner’s ability to use previously learned knowledge in solving problems or completing specific tasks. (Stiggins, 1998) Performance assessment aims to model the real learning activities that we wish students to apply oral and written communication skills, problem solving activities rather than to fragment them, as do multiple-choice test; the aim is that the assessment does not distort teaching. Performance assessment involves students in performing tasks that reflect real-life situations and challenges students to demonstrate what they have learned by presenting a performance. (Gipps, 1994)

4.3.2 Advocating different types of assessment

At present, our type of assessment for students abilities is very single with the test paper and final exams. Traditional kind of test paper makes the classroom activities focus on the explanation of the language knowledge and analyzing the grammar, and pays less attention to the use of the language and the development of language. Just as Brown and Hudson pointed out that suppose a teaching syllabus sets a series of the target of using communicative language, but finally tested in the way of filling in the multiple choices.

Assessment of tasks can be implemented from many aspects. At first, teachers should stick to the evaluation in many respects. When teachers give judges about the completion of students task, they should not only pay attention to the master of language, but also to their other abilities. For example, when students finish speeches and operas and so on, teachers should evaluate their expressions and pronunciations, and at the same time, should speak highly of their imagination and creative thinking and so on. What is more, teachers should combine self-evaluation with evaluating each other. Students will evaluate their own situations including the progress they have made and the shortcomings they need to improve in order to adjust their own study methods and goals. When students evaluate each other, they are required to judge others in an objective way and make some constructive suggestions. It will not only be helpful for students to find out the differences and make sure the next goal, but also to encourage each other and strengthens cooperation.

The last one is that the teachers and the students can evaluate each other. For example, in the textbook of junior high school, there is a unit about favorite sports. Teachers can assign the task in which students can be divided into groups talking about their respective favorite sports, its competitions, the famous super stars and so on. And then the students are required to describe their favorite sports in front of the class. The teacher can evaluate their performance through observation of their expressions and presentations. And at the same time, students can also point out the shortcomings of the task in the design and make some better suggestions. Thus teachers will have a better understanding of students needs and make tasks more appropriate to students.

4.3.3 Achieving ideal effects of assessment

    “Give a man a fish and he eats for a day. Teach him how to fish and he eats for a lifetime. This is a specific reflection of the lifelong education opinions on teaching students how to study by themselves. Task-based approach offers an innovative way to language learning. The class strives for communication and fluency. Language tasks invite students to plan, report and prepare activities. Students are invited to interact and produce language naturally. The students themselves are involved in investigating structures and forms. The main intention of tasks is to help students explore language, to make them develop an awareness of aspects of grammar, vocabulary and pronunciation. Students need to assist each other in systematizing what they have observed and learned about certain features of language. They also need to cooperate with each other in order to clarify concepts and to notice new things by ordering, listing, classifying and categorizing them. Students learn by doing. Only the student-centered classroom can cater for this approach.

5. Conclusion

We can conclude that the task-based teaching approach is very beneficial to develop students’ thinking and creative abilities and cooperative spirits and to foster the learners that can’t understand the knowledge. The task-based approach is task-oriented. With tasks, students have goals, and have a definite direction and they can develop their initiatives to achieve the goals. Through application of task-based approach in the secondary English teaching, students can make clear the teaching goals, and understand all activities and all tasks serve the final goals. In the implementation of these goals, students need to finish the tasks which are from easy to hard and finally to get the aim of improving self-abilities.

After the experiment, we find that the task-based language teaching is helpful to resolve the issues on meaning and form, function and structure. For the students, it encourages students to investigate and cooperate. The students set up knowledge and develop their abilities. The task-based language teaching is helpful to combine the students’ language ability with their other qualities, such as processing information, completing tasks, social intercourse. The task-based language teaching regards the students’ personal career as the important factor of study, and combines the study in class with social activities. Task-based teaching approach pays attention to both language and learning process. It is helpful for students to cultivate an independent ability of study. The task-based approach to language learning emphasizes on learning language to communication. Learners’ independence and their positive attitude towards language learning are also essential to make learning language successful. The task-based approach provides opportunities for learners to learn and explore both spoken and written language through all kinds of activities which are designed to engage learners. The use of all kinds of activities should also give a clear and purposeful task for the teaching and learning of grammar as well as the other skills. Through teaching, the teachers should act as the guide in the task-based teaching. Teachers design a content of teaching from the opinion of learning, the students’ activity has an clear target direction.

In various activities, the students’ brains are always placed in active state, which can cause the students’ sympathetic response and interest. Thus, the whole learning processes are all active and voluntary. Not only they acquire ready-made knowledge, but also have the ability of language usage. And the students can express their own thoughts more creatively along with the improvement of the students’ language ability. Briefly, the English teachers applying task-based approach should bring the advantages of task-based language teaching into full play to improve teaching quality in junior high School. Moreover, in the implementation of task-based language teaching, the teachers should introspect their own teaching continuously, and carry on adjustment in time. 

References

[1] 中华人民共和国教育部. 英语课程标准[M]. 北京:北京师范大学出版社,2001

[2] Willis, J. A Frame Work for Task-Based Learning. Harlow, UK: Longman, Addison-Wesley, 1996

[3] Richards, J. Platt, and H. Weber. Longman Dictionary of Applied Linguistics. London:Longman, 1986

[4] 魏永红. 任务型外语教学研究[M]. 华东师范大学出版社,2004

[5] Kumaravadivelu K. The Name of the Task and the Task of Naming: Methodological Aspects of Task-based Pedagogy. Frankfurt Lodge: Multilingual Matters.1993.69-96.

[6] Stiggins R.J. Confronting the barriers to effective assessment. School Administrator, 1998, 55, 6-10.

[7] Gipps C. Beyond Testing: Towards a Theory of Educational Measurement[M]. London: Falmer Press, 1994

[8] 郑树棠. 新视野大学英语读写教程第二册[M]. 外语教学与研究出版社,2001

[9] Nunan D. Second Language Teaching and LearningM. Beijing:Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press, 2001.

[10] 龚亚夫. 任务性语言教学[J] . 人民教育出版社,2006.

[11] 舒启全. 英语教学与研究[M]. 四川:四川出版集团、天地出版社,2005

[12] Willis D. A Framework for Task-Based Learning [M]. London: Longman Press, 1996

Nunan,D. Designing Tasks for the Communicative Classroom[M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989

[13] 王蔷. 英语教学法教程[Z]. 北京:高等教育出版社,2000

[14] 杨阳. 英语教学法技能与技巧[Z]. 北京:高等教育出版社,2005

[15] 杨丽云. 任务型英语阅读教学模式初探[J]. 中国职业技术教育,2007,(04

Acknowledgements

This paper has been finished, but here I have to say that without these generous assistances, I could not complete this thesis. First I would like to show my gratitude to my honorable tutor, Zhou Ping. Thanks very much for her guidance and precious suggestions from the selection of the subject to the whole outline and the detail context of the whole paper. During the whole process, I have learned many useful things from her, both on the knowledge of teaching methodology and on the rigorous attitude toward the research. My special thanks also give to all my dear teachers in our faculty, their intelligence and spirit toward study give me great motivation through the whole writing. Also, my thanks go to my classmates and my roommates who have shared their opinions and their real teaching experiences with me, all these things have provided invaluable materials for my graduation paper. Last but not least, thanks very much to my parents who have given me great encouragement and do their best to eliminate my frustration. In a word, I hope all these people can make their dreams come true in the future. Best wishes to all of them!  

智尚简介  |  诚聘英才  |  联系我们  |  友情链接
版权所有:@2007-2009 智尚 电话:0760-86388801 客服QQ:875870576
地址:广东中山市学院路1号 邮编:528402 皖ICP备12010335号-8
  • 《飘》与《倾城之恋》中女性形象比较
  • 中国大学法语专业毕业论文写作研究
  • 韩语专业毕业论文写作探索
  • 高职日语专业毕业论文测评体系思考
  • 日语专业毕业论文选题问题
  • 日语专业本科毕业论文现状调查与分析
  • 境外将美元汇入中国方法渠道方式
  • 财产、厂房和设备按照IAS16审计
  • IFRS:國際財務報告準則
  • IFRS:國際財務報告準則
  • 德国酒店中德两国文化的交融和冲突
  • 工业翻译中译英考试题目
  • Introduction to en
  • 从汉法主要颜色词汇的文化内涵看两国文
  • Un problème chez &
  • INTERNATIONAL AND
  • IHRM Individual re
  • НАЦИОНАЛЬНО-КУЛЬТУ
  • ТЕОРЕТИЧЕСКИЕ ОСНО
  • SPE会议论文翻译
  • Project Proposal 地
  • 中国意大利家用电器领域合作的可能性和
  • Career Goal与Career
  • Caractéristiques e
  • L'influence de l'S
  • 英语口语教学改革途径测试与分析
  • 语用学理论与高校英语阅读教学
  • 日本语研究计划书写作申请
  • To Whom it May Con
  • 译文中英对照葡萄酒产品介绍
  • 韩国传统用餐礼节
  • 日本語の暧昧語婉曲暧昧性省略表現以心
  • 研究计划书写作要求
  • Outline Impact of
  • 计算机工程与网络技术国际学术会议EI
  • 微软的人脸3D建模技术 Kinect
  • Qualitative resear
  • 新闻的感想
  • 与老师对话的测验
  • 韩语论文修改意见教授老师
  • 华南师范大学外国语言文化学院英语专业
  • APA论文写作格式
  • the surrounding en
  • Современное состоя
  • CHIN30005 Advanced
  • The APA Harvard Sy
  • Annotated Bibiolgr
  • Acker Merrall & Co
  • 资生堂进入中国市场的经营策略
  • Introduction to Pu
  • 软件测试Introduction t
  • Pro Ajax and java
  • 用户体验The user exper
  • AJAX Design Patter
  • The Rich Client Pl
  • Keyframer Chunks
  • 3D-Studio File For
  • Mathematics for Co
  • The Linux MTD, JFF
  • 中日体态语的表现形式及其差异
  • CB 202 System Anal
  • 论日本恐怖电影与好莱坞恐怖片的异同
  • 俄语论文修改
  • 古典诗歌翻译英语论文资料
  • <한중
  • 公司治理(Corporate Gov
  • 英语习语翻译中的移植与转换
  • 日语(上) 期末复习题
  • ACTIVIDAD CORRESPO
  • 리더&#
  • 购物小票翻译
  • 论文摘要翻译英文
  • Bedeutung der Prod
  • ELABORACIÓN
  • 英语考卷代写代做
  • 日本語の感情形容詞の使用特徴——ドラ
  • 未来創造学部卒業研究要領
  • 光之明(国际)低碳产品交易中心介绍
  • 中国の茶文化と日本茶道との比較—精神
  • 목차
  • Final Project Grad
  • 東京学芸大学>センターなど教員許 夏
  • 東京学芸大学 大学院教育学研究科(修
  • 白澤論
  • ポスト社会主義モンゴルにおけるカザフ
  • 言語と色彩現象—史的テクストをもとに
  • 渡来人伝説の研究
  • 中日企业文化差异的比较
  • Modellierung des B
  • 日本大学奖学金申请
  • 大学日语教师尉老师
  • 석사&#
  • Chemical Shift of
  • 中韩生日习俗文化比较
  • Measure of Attachm
  • 酒店韩国客人满意度影响因素研究
  • 要旨部分の訂正版をお送りします
  • Writing and textua
  • 日本企業文化が中国企業にもたらす啓示
  • 日本情报信息专业考试题
  • 雅丽姿毛绒时装有限公司网站文案(中文
  • 語用論の関連性理論「carston」
  • 組織行動と情報セキュリティ.レポート
  • Bedarf
  • 中日企业文化差异的比较
  • 从语形的角度对比中日“手”语义派生的
  • 中国明朝汉籍东传日本及其对日本文化的
  • 《中日茶道文化比较》
  • 从中日两国电视剧看中日文化之差异
  • FOM Hochschule für
  • Die Rolle der Bank
  • A Penny for Your T
  • 也谈ガ行鼻浊音的语音教学问题
  • On the Difference
  • 衣装は苗族の伝統文化の主な表現形式
  • 日语语言文学硕士论文:日本の义务教育
  • 日本的茶文化
  • Samsung Electronic
  • Synthesis and char
  • The traveling mark
  • The Japanese Democ
  • 四季の歌
  • CapitoloI La situa
  • The Effects of Aff
  • WEB服务安全保障分析
  • 音译汉语和英语的相互渗透引用
  • 中日两国服装贸易日语论文写作要求
  • 日语论文修改意见
  • 英语作文题目
  • 申请留学社会经验心得体会
  • BE951 Coursework O
  • Overview township
  • 日本の長寿社会考察
  • 日语老师教师电话联系方式
  • 「依頼」に対する中上級者の「断り」に
  • 日本語序論
  • component formatti
  • 日文文献资料的查阅方法
  • 日文文献资料的查阅方法
  • 日语文献检索日文文献搜索网站
  • 日本留学硕士及研究生的区别硕士申请条
  • Adult attachment s
  • レベルが向上する中国の日本学研究修士
  • 日本留学硕士(修士)与研究生的区别
  • Nontraditional Man
  • Engine Lathes
  • Automatic Screw M
  • Chain Drives
  • V-belt
  • Bestimmung der rut
  • 中山LED生产厂家企业黄页大全
  • 活用神话的文化背景来看韩国语教育方案
  • MLA論文格式
  • 旅游中介
  • MLA论文格式代写MLA论文
  • 小論文參考資料寫作格式範例(採APA
  • clothing model; fi
  • 共同利用者支援システムへのユーザー登
  • 太陽風を利用した次世代宇宙推進システ
  • RAO-SS:疎行列ソルバにおける実
  • 井伏鱒二の作品における小動物について
  • 從“老祖宗的典籍”到“現代科學的証
  • “A great Pecking D
  • 净月法师简历
  • 科技论文中日对照
  • 翻译的科技论文节选
  •  IPY-4へ向ける準備の進み具合
  • 論文誌のJ-STAGE投稿ʍ
  • Journal of Compute
  • 学会誌 (Journal of Co
  • 学会誌JCCJ特集号への投稿締切日の
  • 「化学レポート:現状と将来」
  • 韩语翻译个人简历
  • 九三会所
  • 事態情報附加連体節の中国語表現につい
  • International Bacc
  • HL introduction do
  • コーパスを利用した日本語の複合動詞の
  • 日语分词技术在日语教材开发中的应用构
  • 北極圏環境研究センター活動報告
  • 语用学在翻译中的运用
  • 日汉交替传译小议——从两篇口译试题谈
  • 総合科学専攻における卒業論文(ミニ卒
  • Heroes in August W
  • 玛雅文明-西班牙语论文
  • 西班牙语论文-西班牙旅游美食建筑
  • 八戸工業大学工学部環境建設工学科卒業
  • 親の連れ子として離島の旧家にやって来
  • 「米ソ協定」下の引揚げにおいて
  • タイトル:少子化対策の国際比較
  • メインタイトル:ここに入力。欧数字は
  • 東洋大学工学部環境建設学科卒業論文要
  • IPCar:自動車プローブ情報システ
  • Abrupt Climate Cha
  • Recognition of Eco
  • Complexities of Ch
  • Statistical Analys
  • Dangerous Level o
  • 中日对照新闻稿
  • 俄汉语外来词使用的主要领域对比分析
  • 两种形式的主谓一致
  • 韩语论文大纲修改
  • 중국&#
  • 俄语外来词的同化问题
  • 北海道方言中自发助动词らさる的用法与
  • 论高职英语教育基础性与实用性的有机结
  • 论高职幼师双语口语技能的培养
  • 论高职幼师英语口语技能的培养
  •     自分・この眼&
  • 成蹊大学大学院 経済経営研究科
  • アクア・マイクロ
  • 公共経営研究科修士論文(政策提言論文
  • 基于学习风格的英语学习多媒体课件包
  • 后殖民时期印度英语诗歌管窥
  • 汉语互动致使句的句法生成
  • 笔译价格
  • 携帯TV電話の活用
  • 英語学習におけるノートテイキング方略
  • 強化学習と決定木によるエージェント
  • エージェントの行動様式の学習法
  • 学習エージェントとは
  • 強化学習と決定木学習による汎用エージ
  • 講演概要の書き方
  • 对学生英语上下义语言知识与写作技能的
  • 英汉词汇文化内涵及其翻译
  • 论大学英语教学改革之建构主义理论指导
  • 国内影片片名翻译研究综观及现状
  • 平成13年度経済情報学科特殊研究
  • Comparison of curr
  • 英文论文任务书
  • This project is to
  • the comparison of
  • デジタルペンとRFIDタグを活用した
  • 無資格者無免許・対策関
  • 創刊の辞―医療社会学の通常科学化をめ
  • gastric cancer:ade
  • 揭示政治语篇蕴涵的意识形态
  • 试论专业英语课程项目化改革的可行性
  • 多媒体环境下的英语教学交际化
  • 翻译认知论
  • 读高桥多佳子的《相似形》
  • 以英若诚对“Death of A S
  • 论沈宝基的翻译理论与实践
  • 论语域与文学作品中人物会话的翻译
  • 浅析翻译活动中的文化失衡
  • 谈《傲慢与偏见》的语言艺术
  • 论语言结构差异对翻译实效性的影响
  • 英语传递小句的认知诠释
  • 英语阅读输入的四大误区
  • 在语言选择中构建社会身份
  • 私たちが見た、障害者雇用の今。
  • 震災復興の経済分析
  • 研究面からみた大学の生産性
  • 喫煙行動の経済分析
  • 起業の経済分析
  • 高圧力の科学と技術の最近の進歩
  • 「観光立国」の実現に向けて
  • 資源としてのマグロと日本の動向
  • 揚湯試験結果の概要温泉水の水質の概要
  • 計量史研究執筆要綱 
  • 日中友好中国大学生日本語科卒業論文
  • 제 7 장
  • 전자&
  • 現代國民論、現代皇室論
  • 記紀批判—官人述作論、天皇宗家論
  • 津田的中國觀與亞洲觀
  • 津田思想的形成
  • 反思台灣與中國的津田左右吉研究
  • 遠隔講義 e-learning
  • 和文タイトルは17ポイント,センタリ
  • Design And Impleme
  • Near-surface mount
  • 중국 &
  • 韩国泡菜文化和中国的咸菜文化
  • 무한&#
  • 수시 2
  • 韩流流向世界
  • 무설&#
  • 要想学好韩语首先得学好汉语
  • 사망&#
  • Expression and Bio
  • Increased Nuclear
  • 论女性主义翻译观
  • 健康食品の有効性
  • 日语的敬语表现与日本人的敬语意识
  • 日语拒否的特点及表达
  • Solve World’s Prob
  • 韩汉反身代词“??”和“自己”的对比
  • 韩汉量词句法语义功能对比
  • 浅析日语中的省略现象
  • 浅谈日语中片假名的应用
  • 土木学会論文集の完全版下印刷用和文原
  • 英语语调重音研究综述
  • 英汉语言结构的差异与翻译
  • 平等化政策の現状と課題
  • 日本陸軍航空史航空特攻
  • 商务日语专业毕业生毕业论文选题范围
  • 家庭内暴力の現象について
  • 敬语使用中的禁忌
  • Treatment of high
  • On product quality
  • Functional safety
  • TIDEBROOK MARITIME
  • 日文键盘的输入方法
  • 高职高专英语课堂中的提问策略
  • 对高校学生英语口语流利性和正确性的思
  • 二语习得中的文化错误分析及对策探讨
  • 高职英语专业阅读课堂教学氛围的优化对
  • 趣谈英语中的比喻
  • 浅析提高日语国际能力考试听力成绩的对
  • 外语语音偏误认知心理分析
  • 读格林童话《小精灵》有感
  • “新世纪”版高中英语新课教学导入方法
  • 初探大学英语口语测试模式与教学的实证
  • 中加大学生拒绝言语行为的实证研究
  • 目的论与翻译失误研究—珠海市旅游景点
  • 对学生英语上下义语言知识与写作技能的
  • 英语水平对非英语专业研究生语言学习策
  • 英语教学中的文化渗透
  • 中学教师自主学习角色的一项实证研究
  • 叶维廉后期比较文学思想和中诗英译的传
  • 钟玲中诗英译的传递研究和传递实践述评
  • 建构主义和高校德育
  • 论习语的词法地位
  • 广告英语中的修辞欣赏
  • 从奢侈品消费看王尔德及其唯美主义
  • 论隐喻的逆向性
  • 企盼和谐的两性关系——以劳伦斯小说《
  • 论高等教育大众化进程中的大学英语教学
  • 试论《三四郎》的三维世界
  • 李渔的小说批评与曲亭马琴的读本作品
  • 浅谈中国英语的表现特征及存在意义
  • 湖南常德农村中学英语教师师资发展状况
  • 海明威的《向瑞士致敬》和菲茨杰拉德
  • 围绕课文综合训练,培养学生的写作能力
  • 指称晦暗性现象透析
  • 西部地区中学生英语阅读习惯调查
  • 论隐喻的逆向性
  • 认知体验与翻译
  • 试析英诗汉译中的创造性
  • 言语交际中模糊语浅议
  • 认知体验与翻译
  • 关于翻译中的词汇空缺现象及翻译对策
  • 从互文性视角解读《红楼梦》两译本宗教
  • 从目的论看中英动物文化词喻体意象的翻
  • 高校英语语法教学的几点思考
  • 高校体艺类学生外语学习兴趣与动机的研
  • 大学英语自主学习存在的问题及“指导性
  • 从接受美学看文学翻译的纯语言观
  • 《红楼梦》两种英译本中服饰内容的翻译
  • 法语对英语的影响
  • 影响中美抱怨实施策略的情景因素分析
  • 代写需求表
  • 跨文化交际中称赞语的特点及语言表达模
  • 实现文化教育主导外语教育之研究
  • 试论读者变量对英语阅读的影响
  • 从文化的角度看英语词汇中的性别歧视现
  • 合作原则在外贸函电翻译中的运用
  • Default 词义探悉
  • 从图示理论看英汉翻译中的误译
  • 许国璋等外语界老前辈所接受的双语教学
  • “provide” 和 “suppl
  • 由英汉句法对比看长句翻译中的词序处理
  • 1000名富翁的13条致富秘诀中英对
  • 英语中18大激励人心的谚语中英对照
  • 反省女性自身 寻求两性和谐---评
  • 浅析翻译中的“信”
  • 集体迫害范式解读《阿里》
  • 横看成岭侧成峰-从美学批评角度解读《
  • 福柯的话语权及规范化理论解读《最蓝的
  • 播客技术在大学英语教学中的应用
  • 如何在山区中等专业学校英语课堂实施分
  • 奈达与格特翻译理论比较研究
  • 语篇内外的衔接与连贯
  • Economic globaliza
  • 用概念整合理论分析翻译中不同思维模式
  • 英语新闻语篇汉译过程中衔接手段的转换
  • 对易卜生戏剧创作转向的阐释
  • 动词GO语义延伸的认知研究
  • 反思型教师—我国外语教师发展的有效途
  • 输入与输出在词汇学习中的动态统一关系
  • 教育实践指导双方身份认同批判性分析
  • 中英商务文本翻译异化和归化的抉择理据
  • 从艺术结构看《呼啸山庄》
  • 从儒家术语“仁”的翻译论意义的播撒
  • 论隐喻与明喻的异同及其在教学中的启示
  • 话语标记语的语用信息在英汉学习型词典
  • 论森欧外的历史小说
  • 翻译认知论 ——翻译行为本质管窥
  • 中美语文教材设计思路的比较
  • 美国写作训练的特点及思考
  • UP语义伸延的认知视角
  • 成功的关键-The Key to S
  • 杨利伟-Yang Liwei
  • 武汉一个美丽的城市
  • 对儿童来说互联网是危险的?
  • 跨文化交际教学策略与法语教学
  • 试论专业英语课程项目化改革的可行性-
  • 论沈宝基的翻译理论与实践
  • 翻译认知论——翻译行为本质管窥
  • 母爱的虚像 ——读高桥多佳子的《相似
  • 浅析英语广告语言的特点
  • 中国の株価動向分析
  • 日语拒否的特点及表达
  • 日语的敬语表现与日本人的敬语意识
  • 浅析日语中的省略现象
  • 浅谈日语中片假名的应用
  • 浅谈日语敬语的运用法
  • 浅谈日语会话能力的提高
  • ^论日语中的年轻人用语
  • 敬语使用中的禁忌
  • 关于日语中的简略化表达
  • 关于日语的委婉表达
  • The Wonderful Stru
  • Of Love(论爱情)
  • SONY Computer/Notb
  • 从加拿大汉语教学现状看海外汉语教学
  • MLA格式简要规范
  • 浅析翻译类学生理解下的招聘广告
  • 日本大学排名
  • 虎头虎脑
  • 杰克逊涉嫌猥亵男童案首次庭审
  • Throughout his car
  • June 19,1997: Vict
  • 今天你睡了“美容觉”吗?
  • [双语]荷兰橙色统治看台 荷兰球员统
  • Father's Day(异趣父亲节
  • 百佳电影台词排行前25名
  • June 9,1983: Thatc
  • June 8, 1968: Robe
  • 60 players mark bi
  • June 6, 1984: Indi
  • 日本の専門家が漁業資源を警告するのは
  • オーストリア巴馬は模範的な公民に日本
  • 日本のメディアは朝鮮があるいは核実験
  • 世界のバレーボールの日本の32年の始
  • 日本の国債は滑り降りて、取引員と短い
  • 广州紧急“清剿”果子狸
  • 美国“勇气”号登陆火星
  • 第30届冰灯节哈尔滨开幕
  • 美国士兵成为时代周刊2003年度人物
  • BIRD flu fears hav
  • 中国チベット文化週間はマドリードで開
  • 中国チベット文化週間はマドリードで開
  • 中国の重陽の文化の発祥地──河南省西
  • シティバンク:日本の国債は中国の中央
  • イギリスは間もなく中国にブタ肉を輸出
  • 古いものと新しい中国センター姚明の失
  • 中国の陝西は旅行して推薦ӥ
  • 中国の電子は再度元手を割って中国の有