Modern and Contemporary Chinese Literature and Art disciplines on the way forward: discursive creation - Modern andContemporary Chinese Literature and Art Criticism discipline construction of a priori Literature and Art, for China, is a new thing.Chinese are no such discipline, but after the establishment of new China, imported from the Soviet Union came, literally translated, compared with literature and science, combined in the Chinese language habits, change the literary theory. Since then, researchers continue to study literature and art to explore and research, has sought to establish as a literary theory with Chinese characteristics, subject, but how much effort is part of a true and honest academic quest then? Modern and Contemporary Chinese literature is not the academic theory of literary theory in the grand narrative of Western discourse ran breathless chase, that is, telling their own stories, the name of their own calculations. Embarrassing! The face of modern and contemporary Chinese literature, theoretical research and construction, it should be done calmly and neither overbearing nor servile first look, reflection and questioning, clear theoretical consciousness, clean research ideas, to understand the crux of the problem and seek a theoretical breakthrough of the entry point, and then Expand the specific research work. 1, Modern and Contemporary Chinese Literature plight of disciplinary construction The development of modern and contemporary Chinese literature and art what is the present state of the industry there is no way to confirm, let alone the direction of its development and future? Modern and Contemporary Chinese Literature andArt is in a very embarrassed state. (A) from the subject’s own perspective: no exact scope of Modern and Contemporary ChineseLiterature since been introduced to the beginning, has been in the Western literary theories of narrative discourse anxiety grow, literary theory mode of thinking is almost a structural model of Western literary theory, the issues discussed also in the Western literary theory of the context where ‘conversion’ and, naturally, in the mode of thinking first on the ground under the directionand scope, the confined to Western theories discussed in context with the issue of default, literary theory, also from the western areas of study in a series of The main areas of concrete expression in a series of terms, concepts, words of the fiddle with the above, such as: subjective / objective, materials / awareness, language / speech, the modern / post modern aesthetics in daily life / aesthetics of everyday life, ... .... Originally, the Western theory, doctrine, thought has been moved referred in, as a reflection ofChinese culture and thought a reference system so that China can play an academic broadening their horizons, expand thinking, to absorb the good things the building of an advanced Chinese academic The ‘know ourselves Baizhanbudai’ the role of a good thing. However, many people always like to catch a new case-differences, the West’s theory, doctrine, ideology terminology, concepts and scope of the direct analysis of China to borrow then that moment came the cultural, ideological phenomenon without adding any systematic study, understanding, reflection , who questioned and labeled as ‘I (have) thought’, ‘I (have) thought that the’ sign to show the breadth of his learning, scholastic ability of the depth and intensity of innovation. There is no doubt that the survival of the Chinese nation-specific recognition, feelings about life, fluttering in the sky of the Western terminology, concepts, categories have been deeply suffocated under shelter. What we see is a series of unknown origins, origins of the terminology, concepts, specific areas on the survival of China’s national situation and feelings about life, brutally distorted. Ever since, the modern and contemporary Chinese literary theory circles have become the West’s theory, doctrine, ideology of ‘race course’ or even ‘slaughterhouse’. For modern and contemporary Chinese literary theory research and construction, the reason for no more similar to Wang Guowei’s predecessors ‘Human Words’, ‘Song and Yuan dynasty opera test’ literary theories such a high standard of work available because of modern and contemporary Chinese literary theory circles Combines Chinese andWestern literature, not based on the spirit to create a series of modern and contemporary Chinese literary theory belongs to the unique terminology, concepts, categories. At this point, it started as the building is not brick, tile, gray, sand, like the basic raw material, can not build a system, not to mention good decent mechanism. (B) From the researcher perspective: unprincipled self-talking to Modern and Contemporary Chinese Literary Theory not have their own unique terminology, concepts, scope andtheoretical context, these are the Western literary theory. As a result, the theory of modern and contemporary Chinese literature, researchers seemed to have a free theory of space. Must be explained that, where the ‘unprincipled’ to stress that there is no principle and ignore the principle of two levels. Because it is now the building of contemporary Chinese literary theory is not available in the basic ‘raw material’, so the researchers are now faced with the phenomenon of contemporary Chinese literature, the use of Western literary theory of the ‘tools’, with their own preferences and will be free to play, ‘innovative’ interpretation, where, as a consequence to understand because unprincipled to follow, but as a reason to look at the consequences is to ignore the principle of arbitrary rule. Here’s ‘telling their own stories’ to emphasize that the system does not revolve around specific issues to discuss and contend, but rather with the spirits, or have been deliberate acts and practices. Modern and ContemporaryChinese Literary Theory study is ‘unprincipled’ because the modern and contemporary Chinese literary theory not have their own specific terminology, concepts, categories. Modern and Contemporary Chinese Literary Theory study is ‘telling their own stories’, because now the study of contemporary Chinese literary theory or ignoring the principle of unprincipled Ke Yi. As a result, modernand contemporary Chinese literary theory unprincipled study the root causes of telling their own stories in their not have their own unique terminology, concepts, categories and expand the theoretical context. In fact, it is precisely because the researchers attempt in the existing terms, concepts, scope and its theoretical discourse to the work of labor-saving innovation in the theory of rational function loss and inevitable aspects of incapacity to carry out building work. Such a vicious circle of modern and contemporaryChinese literary theory for the study and construction is a devastating disaster. (3) status from the research perspective: no systematic study Above, from modern and contemporary Chinese literature and art disciplines itself and its researchers have conducted a rigorous level of review and careful reflection, by such subjective and objective two-dimensional surface to examine the status of their research will be given what kind of conclusion? From the subject’s own perspective, modern and contemporaryChinese literature and art do not own the exact scope of literary theory in the West, the scope, structure and its theoretical discourse started research work. Thus, it should be said that without the exact scope of their discipline is not and can not build from truly belongs to the academic system, even if Western theories, doctrines, ideas of resources, due to Western theories, ideas, theory is the Western languages the system generated and carried out within the framework, it is clear from neither Chinese nor Western,modern Chinese language unifying the West of resources to trying to build a discipline, to a certain degree of point of view, this is somewhat wishful thinking. Maybe somebody will say, on the theory of modern and contemporary Chinese literature, writing a lot, there are some systemic results, however, those who hold this view is a serious reflection before, a specific historical time and space of their own national common language of theoretical work, the West’s theory, doctrine, ideology, the survival of the modernChinese nation to realize and feelings about life, how grossly distorted, how cruel to ‘dismember’! From the researcher’s perspective, modern and contemporary Chinese literature and art workers of their own kind of unprincipled conduct by self-activity. This is a direct consequence of the result is not common for them to establish a series of interconnected issues. Such a lack of focus on the common issues associated with the inherent non-systemic theoretical work in the construction of a discipline, there is no help, on the contrary, to a certain extent, hinder or even undermine the building of a discipline, This is because these practices will only be a rational sense of vague, misleading rational thinking, rational function of wear and tear. Therefore, the face of modernand contemporary Chinese literature and art disciplines, the status quo, it should be frankly admitted that the commencement of their theoretical work is in a pointless and chaotic disorder. Obtained by this attitude and understanding of contemporary Chineseliterature and art disciplines to explore the theory of building and systems have launched a priori theoretical basis and principles. 2,Modern and Contemporary Chinese Literature of the reasons for the plight of disciplinary construction The next should be analyzed is the Modern and Contemporary Chinese Literature and Art disciplines described above and the reason why the plight of the reasons as to why modern and contemporary Chinese literature and art disciplines will be caught in such a predicament, this is for out of the woods, looking direction have to do a basic theoretical work. (A) No subjective consciousness Modern and ContemporaryChinese Literature in the disciplines, there were two such cases, one in a quandary, facing the modern and contemporary Chineseliterature and art disciplines, the status quo, these people are not certain of what is now reached the step, can not be sure where the future direction , which along what direction. Modern and Contemporary Chinese Literature in the disciplines of the public voice of Sound and the Fury is unending reality, these people feel a potential crisis and disaster, but losing the sense of direction, there is no clear rational consciousness, Ever since, the only feel intermittent vertigo and shudder. Second, blindly ‘follow suit’, that is, only found a ‘wind’ and blindly follow, thinking that this can effectively build modern and contemporary Chinese literature andart disciplines, whether to ignore or even abandon the reality of the situation of contemporary China and theoretical basis. Here there are two situations: First, follow the ‘archaic’, the proposition that retro ancient Chinese literary theory to build modern andcontemporary Chinese literature and art disciplines. In modern and contemporary Chinese literary theory circles, in 1995, launched the ‘Modern Transformation of Chinese Literary Theory’ in academic discussions, which lasted more than three years, with almost no substantive theory of creative, perhaps only from the sponsors of the event and participants felt it may be truly modernand contemporary Chinese literature and art while trying to discipline the plight of the construction of traditional Chinese literary theory from the conversion to achieve the theoretical breakthroughs and achievements of the dimensions to see the significance of the academic controversy. Ancient Chinese literary theory in ancient Chinese in the system generated and constructed by a theory paradigm, and contemporary Chinese literature and theory to go by the language of systems is only in modern Chinese, andbecause of modern Chinese and ancient Chinese in real terms is purely two separate language systems, although using the same writing system, therefore, neglect or even ignore as a carrier and theoretical context of the language system generates the essential differences caused by cultural and ideological differences in the nature of the attempt by a culture (language) into the system, converted to another form of a theory of culture (language) into the system and the corresponding theoretical patterns of thinking into the road itself is impossible. Thus, here, ‘Modern Transformation of Chinese Literary Theory’ academic activities more than three years on the hastily only the fundamental and profound reason to be clarified. One is to recover with the ‘west wind’, which called for the introduction of Western literary theory of modern and contemporary Chinese literature and theoretical circles. There is no doubt that the Western literary theory a complete system, the system’s scope, a common problem, but it must be that the Western literary theory in the West, the language of the system generated and constructed by a theoretical paradigm, it permeated with the West to survive the situation of human identification, specific feelings about life, spirit, temperament. This is contained in the negative, and the modern Chinese people realize that modern Chinese life situation, feelings about life, spirit, temperament is the essence of nature there are differences. This will be the Western literary theory to systematically move tomodern and contemporary Chinese literary theory and practice of the concept of community is no doubt that the survival ofmodern and contemporary Chinese people recognize that feelings about life are completely obscured or even whether it has beencompletely abandoned as the price. Thus, this purely ‘westernization’ ideas may not be more than ‘retro-oriented’ instead of thinking of much more sophisticated and even more crass and clumsy, though from a theoretical system, to see a more system-dimensional surface. For Modern and Contemporary Chinese Literature and Art building at a loss to the phenomenon of subjects,how much is a pity, then, and for blindly ‘follow suit’, whether it is to follow the ‘archaic’ or catch with the ‘west wind’ phenomenon is very sad but unfortunately the. Here, it should be understood that the above thinking and behavior of one of the most fundamental characteristics of contemporary China is not in the present Discipline of Literary Theory building efforts in setting up the position of the main body, which is engaged in causes of Modern and Contemporary Chinese Literature and Art of Discipline Construction theoretical exploration in the start before, during and even beyond are not in a rational consciousness to establish the dominant position of the object of their research, that is in a state of non-subjective consciousness of the rash. Reposted elsewhere in the paper for free download (B) The sense of dislocation theory of In Modern and Contemporary Chinese Literature Subject Construction of Analysis of the reasons for the plight of the work, there is one to the internal reasons, that is, its sense of dislocation theory researchers. The so-called sense of dislocation theory, refers to the absence of a theory of consciousness or awareness due to be replaced to another theory, was inverted, were Suspended, were marginalized, and even whether it has abandoned a state of consciousness. A case of, first, the theoretical analysis of the lack of a priori before the critical consciousness; there was a lack of literary experience real sense of understanding. 1, the theoretical analysis of critical consciousness before the lack of a priori Prior to the commencement of a theoretical analysis, taking into account whether the study of this theory, there is no solid theoretical ‘foundation’, is there through the reduction to find a practical theory of the growth point, is there to establish a correct theoretical values, there is no fixed the principle of effective theory, there is no theoretical study has delineated the boundaries of proper rational consciousness directly determines the need for theoretical research carried out, validity and significance. Mr. Liu Shilin behavior of such theories are called ‘transcendental critique’, ie ‘in the spirit of the production of specific production concept within the main body prior to the legality of a review and critique’. It should be said to ‘a priori criticism of’ academic research in the humanities and methodology is a fundamental problem. Modern and Contemporary Chinese Literature and Art for the construction of subjects, a priori the fundamental purpose of a critical discourse to establish the scope of China’s system determines the direction of a reliable; its basic approach is the ‘narrative of Western literary theory itself, whether in China, the legitimacy of’ this fundamental issues of review and criticism, in order to save and activate the function of the main body of theoretical reason; its desired effect is the ‘theoretical approaches can be avoided and the West regardless of indiscriminately’ pot-side ‘, you can completely change the kind of’ pollution first, after Governance ‘(that is, first explained in a way, somethinghas gone wrong after criticism) this reason the academic standards of the extreme backward mode of production’ [1] P119 andeliminate the production of mental resources and environmental destruction and the rational function of the principal vicious loss [1] P120 and theoretical studies of normal and effective realization of the ‘operation of’ ideal. Indeed, a priori meaning of course, a major criticism of the methodology. In my opinion, before the commencement of a priori theory of critical behavior, should also have a sense of transcendental critique, that is, before the commencement of the theoretical research carried out its own review of a rational and critical state of consciousness. In other words, before the commencement of theoretical research on the existence of a review of their own rational and critical consciousness, or, in the theoretical study had been before the commencement of a rational awareness of their own rational and critical review of the necessary a. If for researchers in theoretical research started before, during and even beyond have not felt the need for their theoretical work, itself a rational and critical awareness of the review, then, stressed the critical theory of the act would be a priori is very to abrupt. Only when the researchers actually aware of his own theoretical work, the review itself launch a rational and critical when necessary, that is, a priori critical consciousness researchers driven by researchers at the start time of reflection and questioning, a priori critical the theory of behavior have the inner strength carried out the theoretical significance and practical possibility. Therefore, modern and contemporary Chineseculture in academic research, a priori lacking critical, not critical researchers without a priori reason unable or unwilling to expand the transcendental critique questioning the validity of their theoretical work, but the researchers a priori criticism Awareness lacking! Just think, if every Chinese academic person (if any) have such a sense of transcendental critique, the Chinese academic community, academic China would not have such and such, but rather ‘flowers are fragrant,’ a par with the West, and can conduct real dialogue and exchange. China is also true literary theory circles. Transcendental critical consciousness is ‘purely rational function’ [1] P119 a priori schema, is to achieve the main function of a priori rational and practical experience in the domain of ‘communication’ as an intermediary. Pure function is the main reason the provisions of the first heaven and earth, andits a priori schema, a priori critical consciousness, then the first on the ground there in the consciousness of the subject domain, in the corresponding practical activities because of the real thing has been activated to stimulate the body , thus, the function of pure reason a priori rational capacity to be effective, a theoretical study of each work itself rational and critical review in order to determine the validity of theoretical research. Modern and Contemporary Chinese Literature and Art for the discipline of the building should be borne in mind. 2, the lack of literature and experience in real sense of understanding Literary as the research object of literary theory is concerned that literary works, literary phenomenon, literary movement inherent in the literary feelings, experiences and ideals. This is a basic requirement for the study of literary theory. ‘A convincing paradigm of literary studies should be based on the study of sympathetic understanding of the object based on the creative interpretation. ‘[2] P123 That is to say, the real literary research and criticism is a very real experience of literature on the basis of understanding expanded. Emphasize here is that: first, the ‘realized’ has two meanings, one experience, feelings, first, reflect, and understand that. Experience, feelings are reflections, and understand the process of preparing the foundation; reflection, and understand that experience, feel substantial extraction, sublimation. Second, regardless of experience, feeling, or reflection, and understand that to be true. Is not true of the superficial experience, feeling sympathetic understanding can not be achieved, thus, reflect, and understand that the foundation is not solid, there can be a qualitative transformation; not floating real magic of reflection, and understand that it is impossible to achieve a creative interpretation, even though there may be real experience, feelings, this is just a bosom friend only. Study ofmodern and contemporary Chinese literature and criticism in the literary experience, real sort of understanding is not doing enough or even almost did not do. A case of the first, for modern and contemporary Chinese literature is only real experience, feelings, be able to write a good appreciation of the chapter to become modern and contemporary Chinese literature aficionados, but it does not anything original; First, for the lack of modern and contemporary Chinese literature real experience, feelings, but rather to apply Western literary theory to interpret modern and contemporary Chinese literature, ‘the face of it, it seems to be new, but Western literary theory, it does not provide a new point of view, but only for the Western literary theory provide evidence for the original point of view only ‘. [8] P123 In this way, modern and contemporary Chinese people in modern and contemporary China on the survival of realize that life’s feelings are completely obscured by. For the study of modern and contemporary Chinese literatureand criticism, modern and contemporary Chinese literature and art disciplines, this is only the literary experience, experience, feelings and even this did not only mechanically copying the theoretical study of Western literary theory is useless, and nothing useful. Only the survival of modern and contemporary Chinese people recognize that to truly understand one’s feelings about life is the experience of contemporary Chinese literature, modern and contemporary Chinese literature and art disciplines, the foundation of the building of only realistic. Modern and contemporary Chinese literature and art circles of researchers is not without the ability to truly realized, or is unwilling to spend time tasks are all really sort of understanding, but simply will not have such a clear sense of reason, but with the twist of their spirits Suozhi The only 1:00 to play freely. (3) literary theory and literary practice (experience) of the departure from the The study of literary theory and criticism with the same literary studies, and literary practice to have a close relationship between the absolute and concrete expression in, one form of literary theory as a theory of the literary practice of influence and even lead to relations; First, the practice of literary theory, literary The formation of the decision basis for the development of relationships. Under normal circumstances, in order to guide the materialist philosophy, the second situation is an important model for study of literary theory, that is, from the literary practice of reflection, abstraction and gradually form a theoretical paradigm. A writer to create a style of literary creation by the recognition of literary lovers, acceptable andfollowed by imitation of creation, thus, a literary phenomenon appeared in the literary movement. Here, literary research andcriticism as the study object is a theoretical reflection, summary and abstract, the result was a kind of literary theory paradigm. The reason why this is a common research paradigm, because such a specific sum from the work of abstract theory is easy to operate, with real effectiveness. A typical example of its extreme, it is inside the Chinese classical literary theory Poetry, Words andtheoretical research paradigm, that is, by classical poetry, the words tasting and appreciation of the theory of summing up the work started. This is a typical-out from the literature and practice to literary theory paradigm. At the theoretical level, this systematic combing and presentation of Marx (Karl Marx). Marx in a letter addressed to La Salle in their own philosophical ideas within the framework of the ‘Shakespeare of’ theory of ideas, but against the ‘Schiller-style’ creative style, this is because of Shakespeare’s works very well reflect the history of reality, due to Schiller’s works tend to like the philosophy of Shakespeare’s works do not describe the reality of Marx’s ideas were rejected by the system or even deny its significance. [3] P571-575, however,modern and contemporary Chinese literature and art disciplines building in order to practice from a literary perspective view of literary theory, modern and contemporary Chinese literature and practice and can not be modern and contemporary Chineseliterature and the theory of building the theory of practical research resources, since the practice of contemporary Chineseliterature, and did not truly realize that modern and contemporary Chinese people’s living condition and life of feelings, from the literary practice itself that is the practice of contemporary Chinese literature from the beginning then the discrepancies in the ‘distortion’ . The first case, triggered by literary theory, literary practice, in theory, it is possible to achieve, despite the low odds, but in reality the history of a very real one-off, that is a form of literary theory in the corresponding prior The literary practice andthe formation of a purely theoretical way, and later ignited concrete practice of the literary theory (concepts) and literary activities. Basically, this situation is like this happen, first of all a certain kind of philosophy nurtured a system of aesthetic theory, in which philosophy, aesthetic theory to determine the scope of the system, based on the literature (art) Researchers thus extended play a set of literature (art) theory, then literature (Art) researchers, creators as a creative rationale Zhi Expand Literature (Arts) in creative activities. In Western literary theory, history, romantic and Romantic Movement is the self-Kant (Immanuel Kant) philosophical, aesthetic theory (such as ‘genius’, ‘non-utilitarian nature of the aesthetic’, and so thought [4]), when, after Schiller , Fichte to Schelling, Schleiermacher, Sinclair, Norge Romantic philosophers such as the self, intuition, emotions as their core areas of philosophy, and constructed a set of theoretical system [5] P8-9 based on the successful development of a set of romanticliterature, the theoretical system and use it as literature (art) theory of practice guiding the concept of a specific literary (artistic) creation. Modern and Contemporary Chinese Literature and Art for the construction of disciplines, from literary theory caused by the dimensions of literary practice, China does not like the Western literary theory as the theory of resources in literary theory, theoretical traditions, modern and contemporary Chinese literature and the theory of development is not and can not coverChinese classical literary theory of the nature, and also will not lead to a corresponding literary practice. In short, is the study ofcontemporary Chinese literary theory and construction of modern and contemporary Chinese literature with the practice Buxie Hu,and divergence. 3, Modern and Contemporary Chinese Literature and Art disciplines on the way forward: discursive creation After the above pairs of Modern and Contemporary Chinese Literature confirmation of the state of theoretical discourse and the Discipline of Literary Theory Modern and Contemporary Chinese description of the plight of the building and its internal andexternal origins of deep analysis, and now should try to search for Modern and Contemporary Chinese Literature and Art disciplines on the way forward to provide a theoretical possibility. Modern and Contemporary Chinese Literature and Art disciplines on the way forward is supposed to create their own discourse. Modern and Contemporary Chinese language is a modern Chinese, one independent and complete language system is modern and contemporary Chinese cultural language academic research undertaken by the foundation. Modern and Contemporary Chinese people realize that to survive, life can and should only be feelings ofmodern and contemporary Chinese literature by truly expressed out from a literary perspective. Modern and contemporary Chineseliterature and criticism of the discourse paradigm, scope system is a modern Chinese language. Lane started in modern ChineseModern and Contemporary Chinese Literature and Art building of subjects should have their own independent and complete discourse. Modern Chinese is a new language, it is now the contemporary Chinese people’s living condition, feelings about life, is unique and, therefore, is the study of contemporary Chinese literary theory and construction of the discourse can only be new. Quality words, modern and contemporary Chinese literary theory not have their own specific terminology, concepts, areas, namely,modern and contemporary Chinese literary theory is in a ‘silent’ state. Here, take the emergence of contemporary Chineseliterary theory research and construction, that is, modern and contemporary Chinese literature and art disciplines, the plight of the building the way forward is to create a set of its own independent and complete system of discourse, in short, to create discourse. ‘The slogan of the ability to obtain an academic academic performance, while implicit in the slogan of the school grounds is deep, on the other hand is to participate in the discussion whether the scholars have found reasons to explore the theory of the learning platform. ‘[6] P124 I think that, for modern and contemporary Chinese literature and theoretical research and construction, that is,modern and contemporary Chinese literature and art disciplines, building a sincere recognition of Modern and ContemporaryChinese Literary Theory’s’ silent’ state and thus giving rise to discourse created theoretical work is for the purpose of theoretical study to find a platform for a ground-breaking nature of the theory. Finally, the need to add that: First, this paper seeks to ontology of language is now recognized as the threshold of contemporary Chinese literary theory’s ‘silent’ state, and thus there marked the study of contemporary Chinese literary theory and construction, should be most practical efforts of the most fundamental direction; second, Modern and Contemporary Chinese Literature and Art for the construction of academic discourse of thinking started to create a natural direction is a serious topic of the theory is a theory of complex and large projects, this paper limited to the topic of the border, as well as the theoretical principles of discourse to create, model structure, the available theoretical resources, evaluation criteria, and so the system did not begin to explain the theory. References: [1] Liu Shilin. Literary
